QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 3 (2007): 715
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.715
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs
 * Access To Care Woes
 * Public Coverage More Efficient
 * Empowering Consumers
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
Related Collections
* Consumer Issues

Individual Level

PROLOGUE

Risk-Benefit Information At The Individual Level


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In July 2002, American women and their health care providers faced a large-scale, surprise test of their ability to communicate, comprehend, and apply risk-benefit information at the individual level. Results from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trials of postmenopausal hormone therapy showed that at the population level, the risks of combined estrogen-progesterone hormone replacement therapy (HRT) exceeded its benefits. WHI participants taking HRT were told to stop; those taking estrogen only were not. Each of the estimated six million American women on HRT was advised to have a "serious talk" with her doctor to determine if, in her case, benefits . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies