QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 28, no. 1 (2009): w89-w90
(Published online 4 December 2008)
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.w89
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Comments: View responses
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Musgrove, P.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Musgrove, P.
Related Collections
* Access To Care
* Business Of Health
* Physicians
* Quality Of Care
* State/Local Issues
* Workforce Issues
* Health Spending
* Consumer Issues
* Variations
*Related Articles

Web Exclusives

Doctors, Dollars & Quality

Philip Musgrove, Deputy Editor


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

These are complicated questions, as the following papers make clear—and the answers are based almost entirely on separate sets of statistical analyses. Let’s walk through the arguments pro and con—from those who contend we don’t have enough doctors, and from those who contend that what we need, both to save money and to improve health, is not more doctors overall but more general practitioners and fewer specialists.

How many doctors, and what kinds? Both the size and the composition of the physician workforce might be expected to affect health outcomes. If you have enough doctors of the "right" type in a given community, it may seem . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Specialized training matters—or does it?Does the level of overall health care spending produce better-quality care?


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

  • Richard A. Cooper
    States With More Health Care Spending Have Better-Quality Health Care: Lessons About Medicare
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): w103-w115.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Figures Only] [PDF]
     
  • Katherine Baicker and Amitabh Chandra
    Cooper’s Analysis Is Incorrect
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): w116-w118.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • Jonathan Skinner, Amitabh Chandra, David Goodman, and Elliott S. Fisher
    The Elusive Connection Between Health Care Spending And Quality
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): w119-w123.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • Richard A. Cooper
    More Is More And Less Is Less: The Case Of Mississippi
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): w124
    [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • Susan Dentzer
    From The Editor
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): w87-w88.
    [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Table Of Contents]
     
  • Richard A. Cooper
    States With More Physicians Have Better-Quality Health Care
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): w91-w102.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Figures Only] [PDF]
     


Comments:

Read all Comments

Test The Primary/Specialty Care Hypothesis
John J. Frey
Health Affairs, 5 Dec 2008 [Full text]
Cooper Is Answering The Wrong Question
Barbara Starfield, et al.
Health Affairs, 10 Dec 2008 [Full text]
Re: Test The Primary/Specialty Care Hypothesis
Philip Musgrove
Health Affairs, 16 Dec 2008 [Full text]


Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2009 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies