QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 28, no. 5 (2009): 1316
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1316
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Full Text (HTML)
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Health Spending

Saving Money

PROLOGUE

Saving Money: What Works And What Doesn’t?


The first 100 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The landscape of health cost control efforts is littered with the hulls of earlier approaches that crashed and burned. Are new ones likely to perform any better? According to papers in this section, the answers are yes, no, and maybe.

In the "yes" category, real-world examples are provided first by Arnold Milstein and Elizabeth Gilbertson, who describe four "medical home runs": California sites catering to chronically ill patients that, adjusted for risk, produce 15–20 percent lower per patient spending than the regional average. A core ingredient: primary care teams willing to go to "extraordinary" lengths to protect patients from preventable . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2009 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies