Health Affairs, 28, no. 5 (2009): 1556 doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1556 © 2009 by Project HOPE	New Online   Senate Health Reform Bill   Rewarding Providers   Public Option Policy Brief   Health Reform & Abortion   Delivery System Reform

This Article Full Text (HTML) Reprint (PDF) Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Comments are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Archive Download to Citation Manager Reprints & Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Russell, L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Russell, L.

Letters

Prevention: Russell Responds

As the title of my Jan/Feb 09 article implies, and the article and abstract explain, a minority of preventive interventions do reduce medical spending. So do a minority of treatments. There might be more if prices were lower. A recent analysis reported that statins would be cost-saving at less than 10 cents per pill.¹ Nonetheless, over the full range of effective prevention, four decades of studies show that most preventive interventions add more to medical spending than they save.

Aspirin, pediatric immunizations, and smoking cessation are certainly among the most cost-effective interventions, but more-nuanced conclusions are needed. As I noted . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Louise Russell
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

                      What's this?