|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROLOGUEMedicaid And BeyondPROLOGUE: Addressing the continuing disparities in access to health care and insurance coverage is likely to be at the top of policymakers to-do list in the coming year. The papers in this section focus on the interaction between public and private insurance and how well public programsparticularly Medicaidmaintain a safety net for poor children, especially in light of recent welfare reforms. Medicaid covers nearly half of poor people; one of every five children in America are eligible. The 1996 federal welfare reform law delinked Medicaid enrollment from welfare participation. Karl Kronebusch examines the impact of reform using a unique methodology; his results indicate large declines in Medicaid enrollment, with approximately a million fewer poor children enrolled in the program after welfare reform. But does having insurance coverage assure that low-income children get the health care they need? Not necessarily, according to Lisa Dubay and Genevieve Kenney. They found that children with Medicaid and private insurance coverage have comparable access to care. However, Medicaid enrollees may be better served, be more likely to receive services, have more visits when they receive care, and get a wider range of services, such as preventive and dental care, than their privately insured counterparts. Alternative settings, such as schools, may be one way of improving access and delivery of health services to poor children. James Morone, Elizabeth Kilbreth, and Kathryn Langwell examine the impact of school-based health centers (SBHCs), which provide primary and acute care, mostly to poor children and teens. They conclude that the centers have overcome myriad political and economic obstacles, successfully putting health care where the kids are. The authors believe that the SBHCs could serve as a new model for age-old problems.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||