QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content

Long-Term Care

PROLOGUE

Long-Term Care


PROLOGUE: As if the challenge of inventing a new medical model for chronic illness weren’t enough, the institutional and community infrastructure through which nursing and supportive services are provided to the frail, infirm, and disabled faces many difficulties as well. Nursing homes, home health agencies, and other subacute care providers are struggling to adapt to new Medicare payment systems that not only reduce their reimbursement but also introduce complicated new evaluation and data requirements.

The theory that an adequate flow of patient data might supplant today’s cumbersome and unsatisfactory quality regulation has a long way to go to become operational. Sensitivity to quality problems in nursing homes was evident in the Bush administration’s disavowal of plans to reduce oversight in September 2001.

More fundamentally, younger persons with disabilities have spearheaded a movement for more consumer direction of long-term care services, and more than half of the states have launched experiments in consumer-directed care. Advocates see potential for gains in quality and cost-effectiveness as well as autonomy.

In the following papers Ted Benjamin examines issues raised by this emerging trend, and Robyn Stone explores the ramifications of the "disability model" for financing long-term care. Perspectives by Mark Pauly and Judith Feder follow Stone’s discussion. Then Kieran Walshe tackles the difficult problem of improving nursing home regulation by looking at alternative models of regulation in other countries and other parts of the health care system. Finally, Robert Kane and Rosalie Kane discuss the implications of differences in attitudes and preferences between older and younger long-term care patients.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2001 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies