|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROLOGUELong-Term CarePROLOGUE: As if the challenge of inventing a new medical model for chronic illness werent enough, the institutional and community infrastructure through which nursing and supportive services are provided to the frail, infirm, and disabled faces many difficulties as well. Nursing homes, home health agencies, and other subacute care providers are struggling to adapt to new Medicare payment systems that not only reduce their reimbursement but also introduce complicated new evaluation and data requirements. The theory that an adequate flow of patient data might supplant todays cumbersome and unsatisfactory quality regulation has a long way to go to become operational. Sensitivity to quality problems in nursing homes was evident in the Bush administrations disavowal of plans to reduce oversight in September 2001. More fundamentally, younger persons with disabilities have spearheaded a movement for more consumer direction of long-term care services, and more than half of the states have launched experiments in consumer-directed care. Advocates see potential for gains in quality and cost-effectiveness as well as autonomy. In the following papers Ted Benjamin examines issues raised by this emerging trend, and Robyn Stone explores the ramifications of the "disability model" for financing long-term care. Perspectives by Mark Pauly and Judith Feder follow Stones discussion. Then Kieran Walshe tackles the difficult problem of improving nursing home regulation by looking at alternative models of regulation in other countries and other parts of the health care system. Finally, Robert Kane and Rosalie Kane discuss the implications of differences in attitudes and preferences between older and younger long-term care patients.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||