|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PROLOGUEHospital Competition And ConsolidationPROLOGUE: As a new election cycle approaches, amid a plethora of anxieties ranging from fears of future terrorist attacks to the lethargic state of the economy, health carerelated issues have once again vaulted to prominence in the public consciousness. Such renewed attention is hardly surprising, since private health insurance premiums rose 13.9 percent over the past year, topping a three-year run of double-digit increases. Although employers have not responded to such unwelcome news by moving in large numbers to drop employee health benefits, many workers have nonetheless been asked in recent months to shoulder an increasing portion of these premium hikes. Bradley Strunk and Paul Ginsburg of the Center for Studying Health System Change have noted that the high cost of health insurance is largely attributable to periods of sustained, rapid growth in underlying health care costs. For example, per capita spending for the privately insured, down slightly from 2001, advanced four times faster than overall economic growth in 2002. Interestingly, however, given that roughly half of this overall accelerated growth in health care spending emanated from increases in inpatient and outpatient hospital care, during the past two years spending on hospital care has supplanted spikes in prescription drug costs as the chief driver of the high price of U.S. health care. Given the impact that hospital care spending exerts on the overall health care cost environment, the papers that follow provide welcome insight into the changing competitive and structural dynamics of the hospital sector, as well as the role of regulatory authority in policing this marketplace to protect public access to high-quality, affordable care. First, Allison Evans Cuellar and Paul Gertler traverse the turbulent landscape of hospital consolidation in the late 1990s, in the interests of advancing understanding of the effect of the formation of locally concentrated hospital systems on both cost and quality of care. Next, Peter Hammer and Bill Sage examine the implications for antitrust enforcement of shifting configurations in hospitalhospital, hospitalphysician, and hospitalpayer affiliations, posing the key question of what role regulation and public purchasing should ultimately play in maintaining the competitiveness of the hospital marketplace. Finally, Federal Trade Commission (FTC) chair Timothy Muris, in a conversation with Sage, brings us full circle by describing the role and philosophy of the commission in applying empirical evidence to enforcement actions intended to ensure that the various sectors of the health care arenaincluding hospitals, physicians, and drug producersconform to basic rules of fair business practice, enabling the natural mechanisms of the marketplace to work for the benefit of consumers.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||