QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 23, no. 3 (2004): 68
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.68
© 2004 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content

Nurse Migration

PROLOGUE

Can Migration Cure Nurse Shortages? Should It?


PROLOGUE: The intermittent nurse shortages in the world’s richest countries have created a steady flow of nurses from the developing world, breeding a cottage industry of immigration brokers and sometimes leaving a tattered health care system in source countries. These two papers by the top U.S. researchers on the nurse workforce analyze the trends in nurse migration but then stop to ask the broader questions about the ethics of luring nurses away from their home countries when the shortage is caused by breakdowns in the medical education system of the developed world.

In the first paper Linda Aiken of the University of Pennsylvania nursing school and her colleagues demonstrate the extent to which foreign-born workers are filling the gaps in several English-speaking countries and how, despite the immigration of foreign-born nurses, nurse shortages are expected to grow. Foreign-born nurses are increasing as a percentage of the nurse workforce in the United States. The United Kingdom saw greater numbers of foreign-educated than domestically educated nurses join its workforce. And Ireland, once an exporter of nurses, has seen the flow reverse as a result of an economic boom and an expansion in the number of nurse positions. Meanwhile, source countries are feeling the effects of nurse emigration. Although the Philippines has had a deliberate policy of training nurses for export to help bring in hard currency as emigrants send money home to their families, the country now is suffering a nurse shortage of its own. Aiken and colleagues write that responsibility for the migration patterns lies at the feet of developed nations: "Sustained underinvestment in nursing education is a theme across the countries that are now turning to aggressive international recruitment," they write. "The world’s nurse supply appears insufficient to meet global needs now and in the future. Countries that use the most nurses should make the biggest investments in nursing education in both their own and the developing countries from which they recruit nurses."

In the second paper Barbara Brush of Boston College’s Connell School of Nursing and colleagues ask some broader questions about quality and ethics in a U.S. context. Little is known about the quality effects of an increasing reliance on foreign-born nurses. Testing and certification prove technical competence, but differences in clinical care between native and foreign-born nurses has not been assessed. Meanwhile, the effects of the nurse "brain drain" on source countries’ health care systems and economies must be considered by any country that is a net nurse importer, along with its own long-term strategies for training and retaining nurses.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2004 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies