QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 25, no. 2 (2006): 566
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.566
© 2006 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Simmons, H. E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Simmons, H. E.

Letters

Reform Before Calamity


Victor Fuchs and Ezekiel Emanuel’s discussion of health care reform (Nov/Dec 05) calls prospects for comprehensive reform "dim" in the near term. They write that reform prospects could be advanced by "a major war, a depression, or large-scale civil unrest"—or, they add, a "national health care crisis, such as a flu pandemic," also might suffice.

For readers dismayed by that menu of catalysts, they offer up another scenario: that reform might be impelled by a combination of factors, such as widespread unhappiness in the business community with the trajectory of employer-sponsored coverage; states’ inability to keep up with the budgetary obligations imposed by health care entitlements; and a fiscal crisis in Medicare.

A few observations: (1) In most countries that have managed to construct universal health care systems, that achievement was not precipitated by cataclysms exogenous to their prior health care arrangements. (2) The potential confluence of catalyzing circumstances that the authors posit as an alternative scenario is already emerging. (3) Other sources of pressure for reform are becoming more active and insistent in their advocacy, including pension and health funds; religious congregations; health care providers; and unions.

The country’s biggest and broadest alliance of organizations working for systemwide health care reform—the National Coalition on Health Care—has doubled in size during the past few years. Collectively, our member organizations now represent about 150 million Americans.

The coalition has issued ambitious recommendations to achieve universal coverage, slow increases in health care costs, and improve the quality of care. In addition, we recently commissioned and issued a careful analysis by Ken Thorpe of the costs and huge savings associated with our recommendations.

Organizationally and analytically, there is a strong base to build on, as well as a strong basis for believing that health care reform can be attained without a precursory calamity.

Henry E. Simmons


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2006 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies