|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Mental Health Maze: Some Progress, Many PitfallsON THE DAY IN APRIL 2002 that presidential candidate George W. Bush heralded his intentions to create a commission on improving the way mental health services are delivered, Sen. Pete V. Domenici, a Republican who has long been a strong advocate for people with mental illnesses, was at his side in New Mexico. Bush asserted: "Americans with mental illness...deserve excellent care. They deserve a health system that treats their illnesses with the same urgency as a physical illness." Fifteen months later, when the final report of the Presidents New Freedom Commission on Mental Health was released, the event lacked the presence of Bush, the fanfare of a White House ceremony, or even a press conference. Two years after that, when lack of progress toward achieving the reports sweeping goals was readily apparent, advocates mobilized behind a campaign that called for more-aggressive action by policymakers on behalf of people with mental illnesses. With this issue, Health Affairs is weighing in on this subject as well. Most of our papers point to some modest signs of progress but, overall, a lack of political will to improve the mental health system. Richard Frank and Howard Goldman were our editorial advisers and provided invaluable assistance in helping shape the issue. This is the fifth thematic issue on mental health that Health Affairs has published since 1992 with support from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. We acknowledge this support with great appreciation because it has enabled the journal to attract the best minds in mental health policy and research. The foundation also deserves high praise for its unstinting support of mental health research networks whose members have produced many of the manuscripts we have published over the past fifteen years.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||