QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 26, no. 4 (2007): 971
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.971
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * New Issue: China & India
 * Obesity In China
 * Pay Cuts For Medicare Docs
 * Access To Care Woes
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when eLetters are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
Related Collections
* International Issues
* Health Spending

Out-Of-Pocket Spending

PROLOGUE

Out-Of-Pocket Health Spending And The Poor


No one disputes that it’s better to be healthy and well-off than to be poor and sick. (Trade-offs between health and wealth are another matter.) Even worse than being independently poor and sick is to be poor because of being sick or hurt, but that is a risk that much of the world’s population faces because they lack any form of insurance and either pay for health care out of pocket or do without it. In the worst of cases, people spend their way into poverty and still do not recover their health, which means that they can’t work and will stay poor. Even those who are well off when healthy don’t always escape this risk; ill health is a major cause of bankruptcy or permanent loss of wealth even among the nonpoor in many countries.

How important is such impoverishment, or the "catastrophic" spending that takes a large share of whatever income is left over after getting enough to eat? Ke Xu and coauthors, all associated with the World Health Organization now or in the past, provide the most ambitious attempt yet to answer these questions, drawing on household data from nearly half of the organization’s member countries. It is a crucial characteristic of all but the cheapest health care that the worst way to pay for it is the best way to pay for many other goods and services—that is, out of pocket—a fact that is still not widely enough understood.

But don’t governments promise their citizens free or at least affordable care? That they do, but even when patients aren’t formally asked to pay at public facilities, the combination of inadequate funding and lack of accountability leads readily to "informal" payments. Sometimes these are clearly illegal and "under the table," but that doesn’t stop them from being widespread. They range from simple bribes for services that providers are supposed to deliver, to gifts given in gratitude for care received or as implicit insurance that the patient will get care in the future when needed. Outright corruption in the health system only makes things worse, of course. This black-to-light-gray market poses catastrophic risks even when care is nominally free, and public promises are powerless against it unless backed up by both money and a combination of incentives and sanctions for providers. In another use of survey data, Maureen Lewis, acting chief economist at the World Bank, examines how common informal payments are, what burden they impose on patients, and what might be done to curb them.

Progress in reducing poverty is real but very slow; poverty that results from inadequate prepaid financing of health care is one component that can probably be controlled more quickly.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2007 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies