Health Affairs, 26, no. 5 (2007): 1509
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1509
© 2007 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Brownback, S.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Brownback, S.

Letters

Eliminating Neglected Diseases: Impact Of Published Paper


A paper by Duke University economists David Ridley, Henry Grabowski, and Jeffrey Moe (Mar/Apr 06) highlights the devastating effect of neglected diseases on people in developing countries. It also proposes an innovative approach to combating neglected diseases: providing incentives for drug companies to bring treatments for such diseases to market.

I have seen firsthand the horrific effects of neglected diseases on impoverished African communities, and as a U.S. Senator and a passionate humanitarian, I have attempted to draw attention to the need to combat neglected and tropical diseases. For instance, last year I introduced legislation in the Senate that was designed to provide incentives for drug companies to produce treatments for neglected and tropical diseases; it would have extended patents for up to two years for existing lifestyle drugs to companies that produced a treatment for a neglected or tropical disease. It did not happen, however. Because of the aversion to extending pharmaceutical patents, I encountered major opposition in the Senate, where the bill languished.

So this paper—and its proposal—caught my attention. The incentive structure proposed by Ridley and colleagues avoids the political divisiveness of pharmaceutical patent extensions. Instead, it creates an incentive structure based on a "priority review voucher" that could be applied to a drug in a company’s pipeline in return for bringing a treatment for neglected or tropical disease to market.

After reading their proposal in Health Affairs, I met with Ridley and colleagues to discuss the idea further, and I subsequently drafted an amendment to the Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act (S. 1082). Indeed, their idea is the heart of my Elimination of Neglected Diseases (END) amendment; furthermore, their phrase "priority review voucher" is the term in the amendment that is coupled with products to fight tropical diseases.

My amendment, which was cosponsored by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-CT), was adopted into the Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act. I am hopeful that this amendment will soon become public law, and I am glad to be able to play a role in making the Duke economists’ intriguing proposal into a life-saving reality.

Sam Brownback, Sen (R-KS)
Washington, D.C.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?