QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 27, no. 3 (2008): 688
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.688
© 2008 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * McAllen, TX & Beyond: An Expert Roundtable
 * Geography & Reform
 * Medicaid or Insurance Exchange?
 * Siren Song of New GME
 * Public Plan Option: Pro & Con
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
Related Collections
* Health Reform
* Politics
*Related Articles

Politics

PROLOGUE

The Politics Of Health Reform: A Collection Of Perspectives


Does politics for all translate to health care for all? In a long and surprising year of primaries and caucuses, with unprecedented numbers of new voters, will health care reform claim top spot on a new president’s domestic agenda? Will all of the energy displayed this year be transformed into real legislative action in 2009?

The following Perspectives on the politics of health care reform start with hope for the future in the form of the Healthy Americans Act, a bipartisan proposal by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT) that is gathering steam and cosponsors in the Senate. The senators posit that different, new, and fertile conditions for health care reform exist, marking this point in time as different from the 1990s.

The pollsters who follow, Celinda Lake and colleagues (Democratic pollsters) and William McInturff and Lori Weigel (Republican pollsters), render a somewhat more split verdict on whether we are witnessing a period of historic change. They both note the deep desire of the public for change, for an American solution that encompasses the view of health care as both a societal right and a personal responsibility, but it is unclear whether deep partisan divides in the electorate and a worsening economy will allow for anything other than incremental change.

The last group of Perspectives by Joseph Antos; Christine Ferguson, Elizabeth Fowler, and Len Nichols; and Jacob Hacker all use the Clinton reforms as a template for what went wrong and what is both possible and needed in 2009 to pass major reform legislation. The authors represent several political viewpoints, but they all suggest that the failure of the Clinton reforms was a failure of politics, not of policy. They all find the seeds of failure in the partisan nature of how the Clinton administration went about the reform business. As Hacker notes, instead of building a bridge to compromise, a transparent process with congressional input, the Clinton administration burned the bridges behind it. Health reform, major or minor, needs broad bipartisan support. It needs leadership from the executive branch and active participation from the legislative branch to muster the support to implement changes.

Senators Wyden and Bennett claim that their bill and their colleagues have learned these lessons. The bill has bipartisan support, and it is a model of clarity and brevity compared to the Health Security Act of the 1990s. Is this the moment? Will all of the political engagement of this year’s historic campaign translate into path-breaking legislation? Or are we headed back to the future?


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

  • Ron Wyden and Bob Bennett
    Finally, Fixing Health Care: What’s Different Now?
    Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 689-692.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • Celinda C. Lake, Robert A. Crittenden, and David Mermin
    Health Care In The 2008 Election: Engaging The Voters
    Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 693-698.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • William D. McInturff and Lori Weigel
    Déjà Vu All Over Again: The Similarities Between Political Debates Regarding Health Care In The Early 1990s And Today
    Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 699-704.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Figures Only] [PDF]
     
  • Joseph Antos
    Lessons From The Clinton Plan: Incremental Market Reform, Not Sweeping Government Control
    Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 705-710.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • Christine C. Ferguson, Elizabeth J. Fowler, and Len M. Nichols
    The Long Road To Health Reform Requires Bipartisan Leadership
    Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 711-717.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     
  • Jacob S. Hacker
    Putting Politics First
    Health Affairs, May/June 2008; 27(3): 718-723.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
     




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2008 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies