|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SCHIP: Where Are The Data?Like other advocates for childrens health, I have an almost religious conviction that the State Childrens Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is effective public policy. Ten years ago I helped implement the program in Indiana, and, more recently, as secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, I submitted a new request for a major expansion of the program in my state. Although I have no empirical evidence to support the assertion that SCHIP is a beneficial and effective way to invest in childrens health, I worked to expand the program, and the expansion was approved in May 2008 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. I was not able to base this expansion on empirical evidence because there is none. In the past decade, a study has never been conducted to determine whether SCHIP actually improves the overall health and well-being of children. In Health Affairs in 2007, Genevieve Kenney and colleagues (Mar/Apr 07) stated, "The evidence on the effect of SCHIP on childrens health and function is mixed." The lack of actual evidence of the benefits for children is simply damning to the program. There is a large body of research on the positive effects that health insurance coverage has on the overall health and well-being of adults, and it is past time for the same effort to be placed on childrens health. Public policy-makers need more than just a conviction that SCHIP works and is worthy of public investment. We need facts.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||