Health Affairs, 27, no. 4 (2008): 1199
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1199
© 2008 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in Web of Science
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Kenney, G. M.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* Articles by Kenney, G. M.

Letters

SCHIP Data: An Author Responds


I totally concur with Mitchell Roob about the need for more research on the effects of health insurance coverage on children’s health and well-being. Roob bemoans the lack of evidence linking the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) to improved health and well-being of children. While there is no Indiana-specific research on this topic, such effects have been found for children in other places.1

Conducting research on this topic is challenging for many reasons. First, one would not expect health insurance coverage to have large, easily visible impacts on health in a general sample of children because less than 1 percent (0.54 percent) are classified as being in poor health, and another 2.6 percent are classified as being in fair health, leaving room for substantial short-term improvement among only a small subset of children. Since the children who have the greatest potential for experiencing rapid improvements in health constitute a small share of all children, very large samples are needed to identify reliable impacts for children with health problems, making these studies costly. Second, it is difficult to establish a valid counterfactual showing the health and well-being that children would have experienced had they not been enrolled in public programs. Third, while underlying health problems may be diagnosed at higher rates among children who have coverage, potentially yielding long-lasting positive effects on children’s lives, identifying such long-term gains is extremely difficult and costly.

In short, shoring up research on this important topic requires a realistic understanding of what health insurance can accomplish for children, substantial resources, and recognition of the analytic challenges inherent in such studies. Roob is right to call for additional research on this topic, and I hope that additional resources are forthcoming for such work.

Genevieve M. Kenney
Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.

  NOTE
 

  1. See, for example, D. Bermudez and L. Baker, "The Relationship between SCHIP Enrollment and Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in California," Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 16, no. 1 (2005): 96–110[Web of Science][Medline]; E. Howell and C. Trenholm, "The Effect of New Insurance Coverage on the Health Status of Low-Income Children in Santa Clara County," Health Services Research 42, no. 2 (2007): 867–889[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]; and P. Szilagyi et al., "Improved Asthma Care after Enrollment in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program in New York," Pediatrics 117, no. 2 (2006): 486–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?