QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 

   

 

Health Affairs, 28, no. 1 (2009): 14
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.14
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Senate Health Reform Bill
 * Rewarding Providers
 * Public Option Policy Brief
 * Health Reform & Abortion
 * Delivery System Reform
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
Related Collections
* Chronic Care
*Related Articles

Scope Of Problem

PROLOGUE

The Scope Of The Problem


In 2005, overall U.S. life expectancy hit a new high as deaths from circulatory diseases and cancer continued to drift downward. Behind those developments: advances in diagnosing and treating chronic illness—from screening tests like mammography, to widespread use of cholesterol-lowering statin drugs. Yet chronic illness remains a formidable opponent that, if anything, seems to be growing in strength.

Examining data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Kathryn Anne Paez and colleagues report sobering findings. U.S. adults in midlife and beyond are increasingly experiencing multiple chronic conditions—the patient with diabetes who also has hypertension, arthritis, and depression, for example. As a result, these patients are experiencing substantial out-of-pocket spending to boot. A kind of perfect storm is brewing, as chronic care access changes shape. Paez and colleagues’ findings reflect an increased reliance on using medications to manage disease.

Sandra Decker and colleagues examine data from the National Center for Health Statistics and report a shift in care from hospital inpatient departments to ambulatory settings. Although these latter changes are not inherently problematic, when coupled with rising uninsurance, underinsurance, and cost sharing for nonemergency expenses they can easily make out-of-pocket spending for chronic care so onerous that people reduce it or forgo it altogether.

Policymakers will thus have to strike a better balance between delivering better chronic care and constraining costs. Is it more important to save payers’ money by exposing patients to copays on drugs, or to increase adherence to costly drug regimens by waiving those copays for patients? And, in the long haul, the papers in this section make clear, the need to reduce both the incidence and the prevalence of chronic conditions is practically a national emergency.


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

  • Kathryn Anne Paez, Lan Zhao, and Wenke Hwang
    Rising Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Chronic Conditions: A Ten-Year Trend
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): 15-25.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Erratum]
     
  • Sandra L. Decker, Susan M. Schappert, and Jane E. Sisk
    Use Of Medical Care For Chronic Conditions
    Health Affairs, January/February 2009; 28(1): 26-35.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Figures Only] [PDF]
     




Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2009 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies