Health Affairs, 28, no. 1 (2009): 15-25
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.15
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Abstract
* Full Text
* Submit a response to this article
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Alert me to new issues of the journal

Rising Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Chronic Conditions: A Ten-Year Trend
Paez et al. Health Affairs 28, no. 1 (2009): 15

Erratum

A programming error resulted in incorrect estimates in Exhibit 5. These changes do not effect the conclusions. The exhibit and surrounding text have been corrected online. The text corrections are explained below. In the results section (page 22 on the PDF), the second and third full paragraphs have been revised, to correct some language regarding chronic disease prevalence that was not accurate. The txt now reads as follows:

An out-of-pocket expenditure index (EI) was created to measure the overall increase in out-of-pocket spending comparing 2005 to 1996 spending, holding disease prevalence constant (Exhibit 5). The change seen is due solely to increasing out-of-pocket spending. The EI for the overall population was 1.19, indicating that expenditures were 19 percent higher in 2005 than in 1996, when chronic condition prevalence was held constant. The younger-old had the greatest increase, with an EI of 1.30, followed by young adults, those in midlife, and the old-old.

All insurance categories, including Medicaid recipients, had a sizable increase in out-of-pocket spending over the ten-year period. The largest increase was experienced by those in the "other public" insurance category, followed by the uninsured and Medicare-only beneficiaries. Although smaller, the EI for Medicaid recipients was substantial when controlling for rising chronic condition prevalence.


In the summary section, beneath the subheading "Rising prevalence and spending," the third sentence should read as follows: "Overall, out-of-pocket spending increased by 39.4 percent per person over the ten-year period." The fifth sentence should read: "Spending increases were 19 percent higher overall when holding the rising prevalence of chronic conditions constant, with the greatest increases among those in early old age, the 'other public' insured, the uninsured, Medicare beneficiaries, the poor, and people who take prescription drugs."

The authors and Health Affairs regret the errors and any confusion they may have caused.