Health Affairs, 28, no. 2 (2009): 601-602
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.601-a
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Muther, E.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Muther, E.

Letters

Online Consumer Information In Pennsylvania


I was heartened to read Michael Rothberg and colleagues’ paper on "Choosing the Best Hospital" (Nov/Dec 08). The authors point to several key issues impeding greater public acceptance and understanding of hospital quality-reporting Web sites, correctly stating that "information must be accessible, interpretable, and consistent" and that hospitals must work with rating agencies and others to develop consensus on what quality data are most relevant and actionable for patients.

Over the past two years, the Pennsylvania Health Care Quality Alliance (PHCQA) has pursued this strategy and focused on developing a uniform and consistent approach to hospital quality measurement. Its Web site, http://www.pahealthcarequality.org, is the first such site in Pennsylvania that compiles hospital quality data from a variety of sources and allows consumers to search and compare quality data (process and outcome measures) on acute care hospitals in the state. It includes representation from Pennsylvania’s four Blues insurers, its hospital association, its medical society, and representatives from state and federal governments. Much of its work has been spent on developing consensus on what quality measures are most indicative of overall quality and meaningful for patients, as well as how those data can best be displayed for interpretation by consumers.

We recently surveyed more than 900 Pennsylvanians to gain insight into consumers’ awareness and attitudes toward hospital quality-reporting Web sites. The results indicate that although most consumers continue to cite physician recommendation as the most influential and trustworthy source of information, about a third reported visiting a quality-reporting Web site and using its data to make a hospital selection decision.

Although hospital quality reporting is still in its relative infancy, the PHCQA and similar groups in other states are working hard to establish greater consistency and clarity in reporting data on quality.

Erik Muther
Pennsylvania Health Care Quality Alliance, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?