Health Affairs, 28, no. 2 (2009): 603-604
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.603-a
© 2009 by Project HOPE
 
New Online
 * Getting Health Reform Done
 * After the State of the Union
 * Incremental Reform
 * E-Health in Developing World
 * Most-Read Articles in 2009
This Article
* Extract Freely available
* Reprint (PDF)
* Submit a response to this article
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me when Comments are posted
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* E-mail this article to a friend
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Personal Archive
* Download to Citation Manager
*Reprints & Permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Atanassova, P. A.
* Articles by Dimitrov, B. D.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Atanassova, P. A.
* Articles by Dimitrov, B. D.

Letters

Hip And Knee Implants In Bulgaria


We read with interest the paper by Natalia Wilson and colleagues (Nov/Dec 08) about ongoing policy considerations for hip and knee implants. Summarizing recent evidence on hip-spine syndrome (HSS) management, we contribute recent results from a university hospital in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. HSS is chronically progressing and, if untreated appropriately, leads to deterioration of functional fitness and quality of life. In prior research, surgery (laminectomy) had multiple advantages over nonsurgical therapy in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) at the third month in prospective cohorts. A 7.8-point difference from baseline in bodily pain (according to the SF-36) also was evidence of its effectiveness.1 Supporting these findings, we found that total hip replacement, alone or after laminectomy, was highly effective in aged patients with both lumbar and hip pain. Combined findings from our unique observational prospective data indicated very high efficacy levels of THR (in fifty-eight HSS patients).2

In particular, twenty-nine patients with hip osteoarthritis underwent THR; hip pain disappeared in 68.97 percent of them. Lumbar pain remained in eight who also had LSS. Seventeen out of another twenty-five patients with LSS underwent laminectomy. Lumbar pain decreased, but hip pain persisted. Thirteen patients had hip osteoarthritis (bilateral in six of them). Our most important advantage was targeted, patient-level decision making by a panel of highly-specialized experts (neurologist, neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, roentgenologist) acting together to choose the best surgical intervention in each case. Assessing their own quality-of-life improvement, many patients reported relief from pain. Undoubtedly, our individualized surgery showed very high effectiveness as both clinical effects and patient-reported outcomes, especially in LSS combined with hip osteoarthritis. Interestingly, similar improvements in both patient-reported outcomes and clinical measures were reported in comparable prospective cohort of forty-two Japanese patients with LSS.3

Penka A. Atanassova and Borislav D. Dimitrov
Neurology, Medical University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria Bordani, Alzano Lombardo (BG), Italy

  NOTES
 

  1. J.N. Weinstein et al., "Surgical versus Nonsurgical Therapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis," New England Journal of Medicine 358, no. 8 (2008): 794–810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. P. Atanassova et al. "Hip-Spine Syndrome in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis" (in Bulgarian), Neurorehabilitation 1, no. 2 (2007): 24–28; and P. Atanassova et al., "Hip-Spine Syndrome Before and After Total Hip Replacement" (in Bulgarian), Bulg Neurol 8, no. 1 (2008): 24–26.
  3. H. Haro, S. Maekawa, and Y. Hamada, "Prospective Analysis of Clinical Evaluation and Self-Assessment by Patients after Decompression Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis," Spine Journal 8, no. 2 (2008): 380–384.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati    What's this?