| |
Comments
Health Affairs encourages readers to engage in discussion via comments on our Web site.
- To RESPOND to a particular article: Click on the link "Submit a response to this article" in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article.
- To READ responses to a particular article: Click on the link "View responses" in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article.
Comments to:
Comments published:
-
The Downside of Specialty Facilities
- Mitchell T. Rabkin, M.D.
(
13 November 2003
)
-
Factories or Boutiques
- John A. Grima
(
1 December 2003
)
-
Re: The Downside of Specialty Facilities
- Robert M Narvaez, MD, MBA
(
29 December 2003
)
|
The Downside of Specialty Facilities |
13 November 2003
|
|
|
Mitchell T. Rabkin, M.D., Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School
Send comment to journal:
Re: The Downside of Specialty Facilities
mrabkin{at}bidmc.harvard.edu Mitchell T. Rabkin, M.D.
|
The considerations put forth in "Focused Factories: Physician-Owned
Specialty Facilities" (Nov/Dec 2003) overlook a critical issue.
Specialty hospitals and ambulatory surgery clinics focus exclusively on
the episodic treatment of narrowly defined conditions. And
while these providers seek patients otherwise healthy, should they
encounter other disorders, they may have neither resources nor interest to
deal with those problems. Essentially a production line, they are
uninterested in the whole patient.
The best approach to both health and cost control requires continuity
of care with the intent to promote overall health and prevent illness of
the patient over the months and years ahead. This is unlikely to be found
in "focused factories."
The immediate savings thus envisioned engender discontinuity with the
prospect of longer-term problems of both health and cost. |
|
Factories or Boutiques |
1 December 2003
|
|
|
John A. Grima, Director of Regional Planning McKay-Dee Hospital
Send comment to journal:
Re: Factories or Boutiques
mkjgrima{at}ihc.com John A. Grima
|
One way to perhaps test the extent to which ASCs and specialty
hospitals are likely to become true focused factories is to measure the
extent to which they employ focused factory technology. Do they
standardize procedures and inputs? To what extent? Across the whole
medical staff? Do they alter the patient experience so as to improve
outcomes or increase productivity? Do they use nonphysician providers in
ways that increase throughput? How do they manage for quality?
Proactively through design, or restrospectively through review? If they
are not doing these things, then they may be alternate care locations, but
they are not likely to produce the productivity and quality revolution
that is needed in American health care. |
|
Re: The Downside of Specialty Facilities |
29 December 2003
|
|
|
Robert M Narvaez, MD, MBA, Physician, Private Practice
Send comment to journal:
Re: Re: The Downside of Specialty Facilities
gastrodr{at}drnarvaez.com Robert M Narvaez, MD, MBA
|
Of course, specialty hospitals are designed to treat narrow
conditions patients may have. That description is obvious by its name.
What is not appreciated is that these patients are easily referred to
other specialties for whatever conditions remain to be addressed. Most if
not all of these patients have a primary care physician who coordinates
all of their health issues and does not allow them to "fall through the
cracks" as we see in some large institutions. These specialty hospitals
are both economically competitive with hospitals and more service-oriented
than most hospitals. As a result, most patients prefer the services of a
specialty hospital over general hospitals, which typically consider "customer
service" an abstract proposition for purposes of public relations. As to
whether specialty hospitals will usher in a new wave of improved
health care, considering that market forces are the reason these hospitals
exist in the first place, I suspect that as long as they treat their
customers well and remain competitive, they will continue to exist.
However, if one is truly looking for a revolution in health care, we should
delineate those factors that motivate patients to seek preventive care. We
haven't been very successful yet! |
|