Comments

Health Affairs encourages readers to engage in discussion via comments on our Web site.

  • To RESPOND to a particular article: Click on the link "Submit a response to this article" in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article.
  • To READ responses to a particular article: Click on the link "View responses" in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article.

Comments to:

Gloria J. Bazzoli, Anneliese Gerland, and Jessica May
Construction Activity In U.S. Hospitals
Health Affairs, May/June 2006; 25(3): 783-791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [Reprints & Permissions]

*Comments:Submit a response to this article

Comments published:

[Read Comment] NIPP Versus Nonfederal Hospital Design And Construction
James D. Blair   ( 14 July 2006 )

NIPP Versus Nonfederal Hospital Design And Construction 14 July 2006
  Top
James D. Blair,
CEO
Center for HealthCare Emergency Readiness (CHCER)

Send comment to journal:
Re: NIPP Versus Nonfederal Hospital Design And Construction

drjdblair{at}comcast.net James D. Blair

The National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP), one of four "national initiatives" designed to secure the Homeland and prepare for future robust all-hazards threats, completed its four-year journey to publication on June 30, 2006. The much-anticipated sector-specific designations of "Critical Infrastructure and Key Assets" will not be released for 180 days.

All federal health care facilities are constructed or upgraded to meet strict all-hazards protection standards. There is little evidence that the nonfederal health care design and construction industry is following this lead. Many observers question the impact on nonfederal health care facilities if they are designated "critical infrastructures."

The last decade has identified scores of known, effective "best practices in facilities protection." The article leaves little doubt that the industry is in the middle of a construction "boom." These new hospitals will be the built environment for the delivery of health care for the next 30-40 years. How will a trusting public and other stakeholders view an industry that fails to adopt known "best practices for protection" for their treatment facilities?

Home | Current Issue | Archives | Topic Collections | Search | Blog | Subscribe | Contact Us | Help

© 2001-2008 Project HOPE–The People-to-People Organization
Terms and Policies