Comments

Health Affairs encourages readers to engage in discussion via comments on our Web site.

• To RESPOND to a particular article: Click on the link "Submit a response to this article" in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article.
• To READ responses to a particular article: Click on the link "View responses" in the box at the top right-hand corner of the article.

Comments to:

Gail R. Wilensky, Developing A Center For Comparative Effectiveness Information, Health Affairs Web Exclusive, November 7, 2006 [Abstract] [PDF] [Full Text] [Reprints & Permissions]

Comments:Submit a response to this article

Comments published:

Abbreviated Way Of Speaking Triggers Misunderstanding

Ulrich Paschen   ( 20 November 2006 )

Abbreviated Way Of Speaking Triggers Misunderstanding 20 November 2006
Ulrich Paschen, Senior Consultant IQ Institute for Quality-Systems in Medicine and Science Send comment to journal: Re: Abbreviated Way Of Speaking Triggers Misunderstanding upaschen{at}iq-institut.de Ulrich Paschen	The shortened expression in the subtitle of this paper may trigger some misunderstandings. Decisions are not based on effectiveness alone: The choice is made for quality. And quality is a set of characteristics -- effectiveness, safety, acceptability, good performance, and appropriateness. Knowledge is (or should be) based on evidence -- decisions are made intiutively from preferences, individual conditions, and (we hope it counts more and more) knowledge. The center on clinical practice must collect knowledge on the quality characteristics of diagnosing und treatment, based on evidence, and create an independent forum of discussion. So, we can hope to shape the decisions of patients and their consultants in the way to use the presented knowledge and to prefer practices we know most about. But I am skeptical of whether we can succeed in the plan. In medical affairs, people are too superstitious. Believers in astrology do not suffer from lack of knowledge -- they refuse to use it.